Blog Archives

Julian Assange vs Hillary Clinton Bombshell

In his latest interview with John Pilger Julian Assange makes the claim that Saudi Arabia , a contributer to the Clinton foundation, is a major funder of ISIL. This means that Clinton and Obama had their hands tied when dealing with Saudi Arabia over ISIL, which could have potentially received unlimited funds. It is not a big surprise that this might be the case, why would Saudi Arabia, a fundamentalist Islamic state hesitate to fund “Islamice State” (ISIL) ?

The war against Libya, largely championed by Clinton, led to destabilization in the middle East, with Jihadi groups and Isil  killing up to 40 000 people, this in turn led to the refugee crisis which is now flooding Europe. According to Assange, Libya and Gaddafi were previously policing the Mediterranean, thereby preventing rogue Islamic groups getting control. It appears that in the Middle East you have a choice between brutal dictators and fundamentalist Islam, as the case of Saddam Hussein  has previously shown. Ultimately brutal dictators are more preferable to Islam , which in it’s most fundamentalist version is a most destructive force.

According to Assange ,Hillary Clinton is the centralizing cog in the wheel of Large Banks,  Wall Street and Middle Eastern Islamic oil states. It’s about the money. Apparently half of Obama’s first cabinet was chosen by Wall Street.

Assange provides his analysis after reading many of the leaked Clinton and Podesta emails.

If Assange is correct and Donald Trump is”not permitted to win by the establishment”, what will Hillary Clinton do next ? Fight Putin and Russia? You can bet on that.

Assange finishes the interview by stating that he is a political  prisoner  who has been unlawfully confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London for four years under false pretenses.

Don’t say ‘Muslim Terrorist’

Straight out of the dystopia of 1984.

Straight out of the dystopia of 1984.

 

You can call it anything except what it actually is.

So when ISIS orders Australian based Muslim terrorists to kidnap and behead Australians while  draped in an ISIS flag you just can’t say that is in any way related to anything Muslim or Islam.

 

WHY NOT?

 

Cultural Marxism and the deliberate dumbing down of people. Because if you can cultivate such cognitive dissonance and double think in people they either become incapable of independent analytical thought or worst still active participants in deceiving the rest of the population.

 

Why is the Australian Main Stream Media (MSM) so scared of saying  Muslim, when negative events relating to Isalm occur?

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: