Blog Archives
Why Annabel Crabb is wrong, very wrong
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/why-john-howard-is-wrong-very-wrong-20160909-grcp3g.html
It is a fact of society that women play a significantly greater part of fulfilling the caring role in our communities, which inevitably places some limits on their capacity.
John Howard
Want more women in politics? These are the same people who complain about Pauline Hanson and Jacqui Lambie. Really all this quota bullshit is just a way of shoving social justice warriors, hardcore feminists and communists into parliament. Women don’t frequently stand for political office and of those that do are less successful than men at getting elected. It’s called a democratic vote.
Annabel Crabb is just another whiner who would rather make silly TV shows about politicians than put her non-existent balls on the line and run for political office.
So rather than rant about mindless feminists and their moronic ‘ideas’, lets celebrate the Female parliamentarians that we already have, the ones that were voted in on their merits, not on basis of ovary possession.
This one is going out to Pauline and Jacqui.
Caroline Wilson Vs Eddie Mcguire
lets start with this:
The context
During an episode of the AFL footy show Eddie McGuire and others joked about holding Caroline Wilson under water for a charity ice swim challenge.
The Footy show Both the AFL and NRL versions are well known for low brow entertainment, nothing taken too seriously, with the kind of conversations (and jokes) you have with your friends after you have each finished at least a six pack each. Celebrities on the show have at times appeared naked for comedic purposes. The show is very much no holds barred, and any one involved should know that by now.
The characters.
Eddie McGuire the president of Collingwood AFL footy club and a TV celebrity currently hosting “who wants to be a millionaire hot seat”.
Caroline Wilson is a mediocre sports journalist for Fairfax media very much riding on the gender card.
The pretext.
Caroline Wilson wrote an article very critical of Eddie McGuire management of Collingwood Footy club. McGuire responded with some jokes on the AFL Footy show re the ice pool dunking/drowning remarks
A week later…
That’s right she waited a week.
Caroline Wilson starts a typical feminist campaign against McGuire, pulling in all the cards she can muster,discrimination against women, violence against women, bullying, calling Collingwood’s sponsor GM Holden, completely over the top shit.
She forces McGuire to apologize twice for a relatively innocuous comment.
This is nothing more that a mediocre feminist journalist flexing her muscles in a poisonous political campaign against any target not automatically submitting to her narcissism.
If we don’t stop this vicious behaviors these nasty cunts will be out to destroy another man, just because they can.
Strangely unlike most controversies relating to the footy show this one didn’t involve Sam Newman. Here are some of his past antics:
Your entertainment is at threat from cultural Marxism commonly known as being politically correct.
Women destroying civilisations
Not all women clearly, but enough to do the damage.
Other authors have commented that the rise in the social status of women in a society generally happens not long before that society collapses completely.
Institutions of Higher indoctrination
Janice Fiamengo stuck her head above the parapet to say more or less, “hey this feminism and rape culture is all BS”,”Actually women in the western world have it pretty good right now, don’t believe the faked statistics”.
The response from the feminist establishment was totalitarian damage control at its finest.
Every dirty trick, lie and blocking tactic employed. When you think about its its not a patriarchy we have to worry about it’s really a feminist totalitarian matriarchy that has become odious.
You have to love the cognitive dissonance of the feminists, we want safe spaces for all people to be able to share their experiences, except men, men aren’t allowed safe spaces. It seems like feminism isn’t really about being pro-women, its more about being anti men.
Don’t blush, baby.
More over the top reactions to some minor cheeky behavior. Feminazis have no sense of humor and want to live in a world coated in cotton balls. No word on whether she took him up on the drinks offer.
Maybe we should start a fund for Mel McLaughlin to buy cat food for the 12 cats she will be harboring when she is desperate and dateless the age of 40.
Probably just not grown up enough to do the job.
The Sexodus part 1
Men have basically decided the rules (written and unwritten) around women, relationships and society just don’t suit them any more and are simply refusing to play. While it may seem like a fad or a phase, there are serious structural problems causing this and serious consequences including the complete collapse of society. For anyone who disbelieves the significance of this consider what would happen if women simply refused to (or were unable to) get pregnant; extinction in a generation.
Major drivers:
Dating sucks for men:
Women with either brand your confident approach as talk rape or you shy approach as creepy.
Women are encouraged to classify a wide range of male behaviors as abusive.
Women making an accusation against men are glorified regardless of whether the claim is legitimate.
Women can accuse you of rape and you will find yourself guilty until proven innocent and punished before evidence is produced.
Work sucks for men:
Men have been competing against women in the workplace for decades now, with such a large labour pool and shrinking jobs, wages and conditions, it is not easy.
Sure its hard for everybody to make a living, but men have the added pressure to make enough to at least partially support a wife and children.
Given the relatively low reward in getting married, men are simply not making the effort to climb the career ladder, some opt out of work completely.
Marriage sucks for men:
Divorce rates are high.
Access to your children post divorce is precarious.
You are likely being forced to pay for someone else’s children that you raised as you own.
Divorce is in most cases initiated by the woman.
The future?
Of course much of this is driven by feminism, but feminism’s greatest enemy is just around the corner, the sexbot.
The technology solution to women being taught to to be so antagonistic to men, is to simply recreate the desired parts of the woman sans the politically correct societal destroying baggage.
For those that think this is a fantasy observe the following analytic:
Fleshlight- a male sex toy begins to replace dating
Women investigate gender monocultures
I found two really interesting articles written by women about their actual experiences in gender monoculture.
Gender monoculture being an environment where there is only one gender.
Female only business:
Samantha Brick decided to start a TV channel with only women as employees, and tells the sorry tale of the business’s bankruptcy after just two years.
Any business going bad in a few short years is nothing new, but the behavior of the women in their ’empowered’ environment, ( which the founder believes strongly contributed to the collapse) is quite staggering.
In this female only workplace women formed packs and psychologically tormented individuals from other packs. One women was well known for loudly broadcasting to the office details about her very busy sex life. Women were ’empowered’ and never had to answer to any man, and chose to use that freedom to emotionally abuse each other. Ultimately they destroyed the organization that have granted them the freedom from ‘patriarchy’.
It’s worth noting if a man wanted a men only business, he would be facing court action over discrimination, but if women do the same thing it’s not only accepted, the discrimination is actually celebrated.
“When I needed the so-called ‘Sisterhood’, believe me, it just wasn’t there.”
-Samantha Brick
A female journalist undercover; successfully posing as a man for 18 months:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Entertainment/story?id=1526982#.UcHbjs7tq1F
Norah Vincent, a very dedicated journalist decided to really find out the secrets of the mans private world. After an elaborate disguise regieme she was able to pass as a man. She discovered that men are really quite accepting and tolerant of each other, and unlikely to judge. Even in their private moments they don’t constantly talk about women or make crude remarks about their body shapes or body parts. In the end she develops more respect and sympathy for men, seeing that what they tolerate and must endure from the world is too much for her to bear. She actually got treated for depression at the end of the undercover experiment.
“I really like being a woman. … I like it more now because I think it’s more of a privilege.”
-Norah Vincent
A woman given the opportunity to be accepted as a man, declined the offer citing being a woman as being easier.
I found sources where women made these discoveries, so there can be no claim of bias or spin.
Both women were from the media industry and could have spun the story to fit the Marxist/feminist agenda, but I think both of then saw through the fantasy to see the truth. Good media is about the truth, not the spin.
Feminism and the disposable male
A very well explained reason for female privilege and how it is being continued, albeit now with contempt for the men who provide the privilege, rather than with gratitude and admiration as it was in the past.
Damsels are still in distress, now they are just ungrateful damsels.
OCCUPYMELBOURNE.NET 
You must be logged in to post a comment.