In his latest interview with John Pilger Julian Assange makes the claim that Saudi Arabia , a contributer to the Clinton foundation, is a major funder of ISIL. This means that Clinton and Obama had their hands tied when dealing with Saudi Arabia over ISIL, which could have potentially received unlimited funds. It is not a big surprise that this might be the case, why would Saudi Arabia, a fundamentalist Islamic state hesitate to fund “Islamice State” (ISIL) ?
The war against Libya, largely championed by Clinton, led to destabilization in the middle East, with Jihadi groups and Isil killing up to 40 000 people, this in turn led to the refugee crisis which is now flooding Europe. According to Assange, Libya and Gaddafi were previously policing the Mediterranean, thereby preventing rogue Islamic groups getting control. It appears that in the Middle East you have a choice between brutal dictators and fundamentalist Islam, as the case of Saddam Hussein has previously shown. Ultimately brutal dictators are more preferable to Islam , which in it’s most fundamentalist version is a most destructive force.
According to Assange ,Hillary Clinton is the centralizing cog in the wheel of Large Banks, Wall Street and Middle Eastern Islamic oil states. It’s about the money. Apparently half of Obama’s first cabinet was chosen by Wall Street.
Assange provides his analysis after reading many of the leaked Clinton and Podesta emails.
If Assange is correct and Donald Trump is”not permitted to win by the establishment”, what will Hillary Clinton do next ? Fight Putin and Russia? You can bet on that.
Assange finishes the interview by stating that he is a political prisoner who has been unlawfully confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London for four years under false pretenses.
“A United Nations panel has decided that Julian Assange’s three-and-a-half years in the Ecuadorian embassy amount to “arbitrary detention”, leading his lawyers to call for the Swedish extradition request to be dropped immediately.”
Of course this doesn’t mean that anything will change in the eyes of British and Swedish authorities. He is a middle aged white man after all, and the only legitimate refugees these days are young brown and black Muslim men,whose rape rampages in Sweden and the UK are tolerated and swept under the carpet by authorities, while a white man only has to have consensual sex with the wrong woman in order to be locked away for life.( Of course, the rape charges against Assange have always been irrelevant.)
Ironic, then, that Wikileaks tried to defend the lives of those Muslims by showing how the US committed war crimes.
The US stance towards Assange would be understandable if the US government and it’s president weren’t such lyin’ cheatin’ bastards.
This whole sorry saga is a medieval tale of brutality and miscarriage of justice of epic proportions , but one thing is clear : The West does not have anything resembling freedom of speech or freedom of the press, but is starting to resemble East Germany at the height of Stasi infiltration.
The UN decision, while welcome, appears to be nothing but a cynical exercise in ass covering inspired by Pontius Pilate, paying lip service to the idea of human rights, while at the same time being completely willing to sacrifice yet another enlightened human being who wanted to do good.
So hanving been sold out by a carefully managed implosion of his wiki leaks party, all over whether preferences were going to go to the left or right, It’s pretty fair to say Assange has been used and discarded by the left for apparently failing one of their claimed moral standards. Sure all the sex allegation stuff was carefully put in a memory hole while he was hot property, along with he fact he acted like a bit of a heart breaker when women were literally throwing themselves at him. But that’s the left and feminism for you, they love a bad boy and then want to scream a blue murder (or rape) when the sour grapes arrive. I mean he really should have known that being a white male is toxic commodity to leftists and they were primed to drop him like a stone when a small amount of heat came on.
So all this bullshit about principles ( free speech, transparency, political freedom, commitment….) it all goes out the window when the next bandwagon arrives. So what can we do now for Assange?
The Australian government has left him out in the cold, despite the fact they are right now willing to send 50 police and ATSB to war torn Ukraine to look for Australian body parts and stolen luggage, But a living Australian citizen in a friendly country with a politically hot legal hassle, nope.
So apart form beating the drum and producing memes that might get stuck on an Ecuadorean embassy fridge in London, lets look and some overlooked facts about Assange.
I can almost feel a man cringing at a laptop reading and thinking “Oh shit, what’s this gonna be”.
Julian Assange was born on July 3 1971, the same day Jim Morrison died. Strangely there are more connections and similarities.
Morrison was born in a place called Melbourne (Florida) and left in order to study, later becoming a famous counterculture icon. Morrison famously fled the US to Europe (France) escaping a contrived court case.
Assange moved to place called Melbourne (Victoria) to study, later becoming a counterculture icon. Assange famously fled from Europe (Sweden) to the UK to escape a contrived US prosecution.
Both had in common:
- Had transient childhoods and continued traveling as adults.
- Born during foreign wars their countries were involved in, Morrison: WW2, Assange: Vietnam.
- Well read, serious, intelligent drop outs, critical of war.
- Were described as rock stars and had love children.
- Were applauded/hounded for the ideas they promoted.
- Were politically minded and spoke of their concern for the present and future.
- Were known to ham it up for the camera occasionally.
Morrison in his later years, even after all that booze and drugs makes a remarkable prediction. (That hair is real)
Assange in his early 40’s showing the prediction is true and having a bit of a giggle. (That is a wig)