Sign the petition here, act before 5pm Monday September 10.
In case the YouTube video is disappeared in a giant black maria, and sent off to a digital gulag, we have another copy right here:
The reason the Australian government will abuse this legislation is the lack of a bill of right here, its time to start lobbying for a bill of rights.
This should not need too much explanation.
Слава! means Glory in Russian.
George Orwell (Eric Blair) gave this interview while dying of TB on the isle of Jura. He had just published his final classic ‘1984’. In the 1930’s Orwell had gone to Spain to fight for the Spanish anarchist revolution, he was badly wounded by shrapnel and spent significant amount of time in hospital there. It is believe during his time in Spain he learned of the political agenda explained in the work ‘1984’. Orwell likely wrote 1984 once he knew he was dying of TB as he believed that publishing such a work would make its author a target for assassination. He likely felt he had nothing to lose as he was dying anyway. In the footage you can see him breathing quite quickly after the interviewers first question. He did claim the world was heading towards the dystopian future he predicted. The book 1984 is peculiar for its inclusion of vast tracts of the party’s secret manifesto, as though he wrote a book to encapsulate the publication of such a document.
Chillingly he turns to the camera and says:
Don’t let it happen, it depends on you.
If you haven’t read ‘1984’, you should. ‘1984’ predicts so many things it is uncanny, webcams, the surveillance state, SJWs, endless wars and switching allegiances, a dumbed down population either complaint or ruthlessly oppressed, the narrowing of human emotion to just a few base states.
But is is all around you, so much so you just don’t notice it. Even when writing this article I noticed this:
So more than an excuse to make you read again the article it shows that slowly and steadily the progressive march toward total tyranny continues.
And yes that’s exactly what progressive means, progress to tyranny, and anyone who thinks differently is just a useful idiot.
Android link FREE!!!
Redphone allows you to use your own phone number and is very easy to install and use.
More privacy apps including secure text and chat available at:
In the novel 1984 the state, Oceania and Eastasia are at war with Eurasia, which eventually changes, to Oceania and Eurasia against Eastasia… although the conditioned population does not realise that the change has even taken place.
In today’s society the we seem to be at war constantly, the U.S. has been involved in 72 separate interventions in foreign countries since World War Two. See:
The reasons for this are various, however they all have the same philosophical principle behind them: we are good, they are evil we act because we know better… elitism at it’s best.
Today the boogieman is the terrorist. Apparently terrorists are everywhere, both overseas and at home… if you watch enough Fox News you might even suspect that they are in your closet…
Terrorism gained a foothold in the minds of the public after 9/11, and apparently the man behind it all was Osama Bin Laden… feel free to check out the 5 min clip explaining the official story of 9/11
This event has led to legislation like the Patriot Act (not what it sounds like) and the National Defense Authorisation Act – NDAA. These acts are in direct contradiction to the best interests of the people, they seek to strip away due process rights, equality before the law and free speech. The NDAA actually gives the right for the president to authorise assassinations, no charge, no court, no jury, no justice, only: I think your a terrorist… BANG
To quote Pastor Martin Niemöller (in a critique of German intellectuals during Naziism )
First they came for the communists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
The real story about the terrorist threat is you… because if you are reading this you could be considered a terrorist, if you question the validity of the government, the morality of their action, if you ask certain questions you are a potential terrorist.
Why you ask?
Because independent thinking has apparently become a threat, I must say this only underlines the weakness of the ideological position of the state.
So do you remember those evil, evil terrorists called Al-qaeda, the worldwide terrorists responsible for 9/11? Well apparently they are not a threat, they are an ally…
So all I have left is WTF !!!
In the novel 1984 by George Orwell, a continual revision of the language (known as newspeak) is employed by the state to control the parameters of how the populace can understand a given subject.
Now I should warn you that words have created more revolutions than anything else, they are the most dangerous weapon you can wield, if used correctly…
An example of newspeak is Minitrue (Ministry of Truth) which controls the flow of information such as news, entertainment, art etc. The main character of the story, Winston Smith works at Minitrue and continually revises historical documents to show that the party has always been right, living standards are increasing and anybody who turns against the party has always been a untoward character.
The real purpose of the modification of language however is to restrict the conceptual understanding of the people, the official newspeak dictionary continually gets smaller and so with it the ability to challenge the ideological framework of the state.
So my first example of using language to destroy ideological framework comes from former Federal reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan:
Rather than restricting the dialogue of the opposition Greenspan has simply used words that have no real content, and thus to interpret what he has said is akin to the task of nailing jelly to a tree…
Please take note of the next time you see a politician get asked a hard question, they use similar principles to avoid giving an answer.
Perhaps you have noticed the Australia has a defense force, that it uses to invade other countries…
Perhaps you have noticed that the abortion debate has two pro camps, pro life and pro choice. Clearly neither side wishes to be viewed as negative.
In that last 50 years or so we have seen the rise of political correctness. The history of political correctness is also known as cultural Marxism, and is associated with the philosophical school known as critical theory. Critical theory in this author’s opinion is not philosophy as much as an anti-philosophy, for it fails to encompass all schools of thought and it’s primary modus operandi is to restrict the permissible dialogue of others. The Frankfurt school was the base used by Herbert Marcuse to promote and modernise the concept of political correctness.
Marcuse argued that the free society was a deception and in reality oppressive, and argued for liberating tolerance, defined as: Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left
Please enjoy all three parts of the history of political correctness.
So what effect does this have on you now?
This ideology has resulted in the oppression of free speech, now both the left and right of politics dogmatically adhere to the concepts contained within the ideological framework of political correctness.
If you don’t agree with the Israeli occupation of Palestine you are branded are an anti-Semite (most likely by the ADL).
If you don’t agree with foreign countries buying up all the farmland in your country you are branded as a xenophobic or racist.
If you use the word mankind people accuse you of being sexist.
The sad fact is people have become far too precious… The author is a rabid supporter of unrestricted free speech because the fact is you don’t have to listen to anyone, but once you start censoring people it is the slippery slope on the road to tyranny and despotism.
It would appear that over the years, the concept that the state knows what’s best for the people has taken a strong grip in the minds of the populace. Perhaps what most people do not realise is that privacy is the cornerstone of freedom and it would appear that the state offers us security in return for our liberty or our right to privacy.
To quote Ben Franklin “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety”
So how does one know if the state is pervasively surveilling you? I propose to you that if you have not injured another then there is no need for the state to keep records about your activities.
Now let’s have a little look at some of the surveillance programs the state runs.
Trapwire is definitely something you should have a look into, it collects data from basically everywhere and compiles it into a centralised system to determine who is a potential threat.
Please consider that the federal government is proposing a massive expansion of the surveillance of the population, that has been described as “this proposal is akin to tactics that we would have seen utilised by the Gestapo”.
Now I think we are all smart enough to realise that once a power is granted rarely very rarely is it ever retracted. You should also be aware that the greater the surveillance the closer we get to a totalitarian regime. History shows that the greater the corruption and largess in government, the greater the need to watch the populace for paranoia and a fear of rebellion grip the inner circle of power. If your interested in history, why not have a quick look at the files the Stasi kept on the citizens…
Some might propose that the collection of information is only a problem for criminals and terrorists and can be used to do real good. Well since we have a rule of law… why not employ it and use it to gain a warrant to track someone?
Furthermore you may or may not be aware the document below that states on page 2 paragraph 5
One could consider that access to “cyberspace” is not a right – it is a privilege. Some countries have adopted
the International Computer Driving License (ICDL) or related constructs to deliver necessary ICT knowledge to
their populations. An Australian ICDL could include “rules of the road” including balancing “free speech” with
the consequences of cyber bullying, libel, computer ethics, and an education about other important cyber
issues such as cyber crime (including fraud). In situations where someone has violated the code of conduct
or committed a crime, a judge could have the ability to suspend or revoke someone’s Computer Driving
In other words your servant (the government) has decided that you do not have the right to access information, your servant grants you a privilege to access information and if you don’t follow you servants rules then you will be punished…
So I leave you with the answer, with some humor, because without it the world would be a terrible place:
How could one tell if history has been revised and edited?
Certainly history if full of power mad emperors, kings and dictators that win a battle and rewrite history, no doubt to make themselves appear as some deity. The evidence lies within alternate records that were not destroyed and thus revealed at a later date. Therefore I could claim that simply by showing examples of the revision of history or an alternate record, I could claim that, indeed this most nefarious practice is not out of date…
The first example shall be JFK. I personally cannot accept the official story the there was a magic bullet that turns 7 times in mid air, feel free to sample a scene from Oliver Stone’s movie JFK
If you have further interest may I suggest a fantastic compilation of stock footage found in the epic: Evidence of Revision, see part 1 below.
The second example shall be Robert Kennedy. Now this one does take a little looking into, basically the official version is Sirhan Sirhan shot him and that was it. However the coroner determined he was shot at very close range (~under 10cm) from behind, meanwhile all the witnesses agreed Sirhan Sirhan was 4-6 feet in front of Kennedy. Sirhan Sirhan has no memory of the event and claims quite honestly that this is totally out of character and against his religious upbringing. May I suggest you have a look at part 4 of Evidence of Revision.
For my third example I propose that history gets re-written right before our eyes…