Blog Archives

Privacy under threat proposed encryption laws

 

Sign the petition here, act before 5pm Monday September 10.

https://digitalrightswatch.org.au/2018/08/19/defend-encryption/

In case the YouTube video is disappeared in a giant black maria, and sent off to a digital gulag, we have another copy right here:

The reason the Australian government will abuse this legislation is the lack of a bill of right here, its time to start lobbying for a bill of rights.

YouTubeGlory Слава!

This should not need too much explanation.

Слава! means Glory in Russian.

RIP YouTube

youtubetombstone

Everywhere the truth turns, the censor follows.

The mainstream media failed us so we turned to the internet, and now that is also failing us.

youtubesovietglory

No it doesn’t look exactly like that, but pretty close.

consorshipnodiscussion

Of course censorship means no discussion allowed.

An of course the more you censor (according to their ideology) the more tools they give you for censorship. Censoring gives ‘hero points’ which eventually allows you to brown nose your way to the top of YouTube hierarchy and  development  teams which is ironic given that this process will be the death of YouTube, and the final prize will be ushering in a dystopian world.

massflagvideos

 

But why just censor videos when you can censor comments too?

becomeacensor

Don’t believe me?

 

And because that might be memory holed:

What this means is legions of Social justice warriors and other useful idiots will on mass censor out anything that is inconvenient to their illogical, self contradictory world view.

The new cultural marxists will be ‘triggered’ (aka have a tantrum) and demand that their ‘safe space’  (aka playpen) is disturbed and demand censorship.

We are allowing insane brainwashed children to dictate what can be seen and discussed in this world, think about the consequences of that.

Often the only defense for a non violent activist against brutality, is the ability to share video proof on the internet, and now the second largest website in the world (which hosted much of this content) is about to allow third party censorship.

On a related video of how to blur out parts of a video, you begin to see the venom of the actual YouTube Community.

Because the comments will be censored in the future, here they are for posterity:

===================

ufailowell1 day ago
I’m beginning my YouTube Heroes career by flagging this video
268

99batran
99batran8 hours ago
I kinda need this video so.
ΞΞΞ ΞΞΞ
ΞΞΞ ΞΞΞ2 hours ago
Because of fucking leafy and those types of cancerous channels. The 12 year olds will just go around fucking everyone up inaccurately. :/
luc cruz
luc cruz21 hours ago
oh here comments are not deactivated. ONLY ON THE HEROES VIDEO, I SEE.    FACELESS ASSHOLES
108

Social Justice Spider
Social Justice Spider4 hours ago
Does it really matter what goes on in a YouTube comment section?
1

ARandomCanadian
ARandomCanadian1 day ago
Wonder why they decided to block comments for their Youtube Heroes video aka thought police. Remember, Big Brother is always watching you.
117

Possum Ridge Entertainment
Possum Ridge Entertainment1 day ago
I was hoping someone else would bring it up in the comments section of another video, since apparently Google doesn’t like being told when their terrible ideas are terrible in a direct manner.

It’s because our data for them to mine and sell is plenty good enough for them but the mere peasants who keep them in business aren’t worthy of offering criticism.

Now that they have pretty much a global platform they’re going to turn it into an echo chamber. Activate the Tumblr hive to remove controversy. They just fail to mention that the items that are controversial to one side are the way things should be to them and their drones.

In other words, it’s going to be an idiotological takeover (and yes, I know what I typed) by those college kids screaming and shouting for people to respect their playpens… I mean safe spaces. People like Undoomed, Sargon of Akaad, etc. will figuratively have their heads put on pikes on the home page as a warning to other sane people who might expect reasonable discourse on a publicly accessible communications site.
10

ebertmadwoman
ebertmadwoman1 day ago
Because they dont want to hear any negativity for what they are doing.  I believe they are going to regret it…..
4

kankeinai
kankeinai16 hours ago
Hey, I don’t care you blocked the comment section on your “Youtube Heroes” video, I will complain here, it sucks
23

John Pratt
John Pratt15 hours ago
RE #YTHeroes, If YouTube isn’t a place for dissension, YouTube isn’t a place for art.
20
twistedmetalplayer21
twistedmetalplayer219 hours ago
Fucking Morons, turning off comments on the YouTube Heroes video like cowards because you can’t handle criticism from the community that makes you rich.
9

99batran
99batran8 hours ago (edited)
they disabled comments for all of their videos on that channel lately
The Agent Of Chaos
The Agent Of Chaos19 hours ago
Giving the triggered authority on the internet…

What could possibly go wrong?
31

My Hentai Girl
My Hentai Girl13 hours ago
Lets go and flag the Youtune Heroes video
12

Ravice49
Ravice492 hours ago
already did =)
3

ebertmadwoman
ebertmadwoman1 day ago
Hey Youtube, we were doing fine, its Only “”Words”” in the comments section , if we dont like, we just ignore.  yes some people will argue , so?  Last I checked ‘sticks n stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me’.
12

ZachSplat
ZachSplat3 hours ago
Let me get the dictionary
Anarchy Empire
Anarchy Empire11 hours ago
screw you and your heroes program, we have it hard enough as is an then you pull this ckack! what is the mater with you!!!!!
8

Epyc Wynn
Epyc Wynn11 hours ago
Since they disabled comments in the other video on ‘YOUTUBE HEROES’, I am now going to post here. YouTube, imagine every generic insult a user could muster, combine it with some well-justified anger and reasoning, and you get the gist of how this comment would go if I thought you were worth the effort. Everyone, let’s go to Vimeo, Dailymotion, and Newgrounds. YouTube is no longer interested in its users and is taking its position in the online video-sharing market too far for any reasonable user to stand.
7

Terry Einstein
Terry Einstein15 hours ago
what a nice way to take criticism, disabling comments. You should’ve disable dislikes too.
The heroes idea is stupid beyond measure!
And the name sucks

===========

We end with Stalin’s anthem of the USSR (CCCP). 

Chorus:  surrounded with glory, soldered by [our] will.

USSR/STALIN GLORY(with the Anthem of Bolshevik Party)!

English lyrics – Anthem of Bolshevik Party (1939):

Free children of a state unprecedented [until now],
Today we sing our proud song
About the most powerful party in the world,
About our greatest man ever.

CHORUS :
Surrounded with glory, soldered by [our] will,
Grow stronger and live for eternity
The party of Lenin, the party of Stalin
Wise party of Bolsheviks!

You have created a country on our land [starting] from the Kremlin,
The able Motherland of free people.
Our Soviet state stands as rock
Born by your power and truth.

CHORUS :
Surrounded with glory, soldered by [our] will,
Grow stronger and live for eternity
The party of Lenin, the party of Stalin
Wise party of Bolsheviks!

Rotten breeds of lowly treachers
You wipe from your way with a formidable hand
You are the pride of the people, the wisdom of people,
the heart of the people and their conscience.

CHORUS :
Surrounded with glory, soldered by [our] will,
Grow stronger and live for eternity
The party of Lenin, the party of Stalin
Wise party of Bolsheviks!

The sparking genius of Marx and Engels
Envisioned the future rise of the commune.
Lenin has outlined us the road to the freedom
And great Stalin is leading us through it.

CHORUS :
Surrounded with glory, soldered by [our] will,
Grow stronger and live for eternity
The party of Lenin, the party of Stalin
Wise party of Bolsheviks!

 

====

Vile murderous communist morons!

fuckyoutu

George Orwell from the grave

George Orwell (Eric Blair) gave this interview while dying of TB on the isle of Jura. He had just published his final classic ‘1984’. In the 1930’s Orwell had gone to Spain to fight for the Spanish anarchist revolution, he was badly wounded by shrapnel and spent significant amount of time in hospital there. It is believe during his time in Spain he learned of the political agenda explained in the work ‘1984’. Orwell likely wrote 1984 once he knew he was dying of TB as he believed that publishing such a work would make its author a target for assassination. He likely felt he had nothing to lose as he was dying anyway. In the footage you can see him breathing quite quickly after the interviewers first question. He did claim the world was heading towards the dystopian future he predicted. The book 1984 is peculiar for its inclusion of vast tracts of the party’s secret manifesto, as though he wrote a book to encapsulate the publication of such a document.

Chillingly he turns to the camera and says:

 

Don’t let it happen, it depends on you.

-George Orwell

 

If you haven’t read ‘1984’, you should. ‘1984’ predicts so many things it is uncanny, webcams, the surveillance state, SJWs, endless wars and switching allegiances, a dumbed down population either complaint or ruthlessly oppressed, the narrowing of human emotion to just a few base states.

But is is all around you, so much so you just don’t notice it. Even when writing this article I noticed this:

 

=======================================================================

dystopian spellcheck

========================================================================

So more than an excuse to make you read again the article it shows that slowly and steadily the progressive march toward total tyranny continues.

And yes that’s exactly what progressive means, progress to tyranny, and anyone who thinks differently is just a useful idiot.

Free secure communications: Redphone

redphone androidNeed a private conversation? The future is end to end encryption, and the latest is Redphone:

 

Android link  FREE!!!

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcrime.redphone&hl=en

Iphone/IOS  $1.99

https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/red-phone/id356116576?mt=8

Redphone allows you to use your own phone number and is very easy to install and use.

More privacy apps including secure text and chat available at:

https://whispersystems.org/

 

 

Endless wars, the continued threat to society in the theme of 1984

In the novel 1984 the state, Oceania and Eastasia are at war with Eurasia, which eventually changes, to Oceania and Eurasia against Eastasia…  although the conditioned population does not realise that the change has even taken place.

In today’s society the we seem to be at war constantly, the U.S. has been involved in 72 separate interventions in foreign countries since World War Two.  See:

http://johnpilger.com/videos/breaking-the-silence-truth-and-lies-in-the-war-on-terror

The reasons for this are various, however they all have the same philosophical principle behind them: we are good, they are evil we act because we know better…   elitism at it’s best.

Today the boogieman is the terrorist.  Apparently terrorists are everywhere, both overseas and at home…  if you watch enough Fox News you might even suspect that they are in your closet…

Terrorism gained a foothold in the minds of the public after 9/11, and apparently the man behind it all was Osama Bin Laden…   feel free to check out the 5 min clip explaining the official story of 9/11

This event has led to legislation like the Patriot Act (not what it sounds like) and the National Defense Authorisation Act – NDAA.  These acts are in direct contradiction to the best interests of the people, they seek to strip away due process rights, equality before the law and free speech.  The NDAA actually gives the right for the president to authorise assassinations, no charge, no court, no jury, no justice, only: I think your a terrorist… BANG

To quote Pastor Martin Niemöller (in a critique of German intellectuals during Naziism )

First they came for the communists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.

The real story about the terrorist threat is you…   because if you are reading this you could be considered a terrorist, if you question the validity of the government, the morality of their action, if you ask certain questions you are a potential terrorist.

Why you ask?

Because independent thinking has apparently become a threat, I must say this only underlines the weakness of the ideological position of the state.

and

So do you remember those evil, evil terrorists called Al-qaeda, the worldwide terrorists responsible for 9/11?  Well apparently they are not a threat, they are an ally…

and

So all I have left is   WTF !!!

Controlling ideology through language, in the theme of 1984

In the novel 1984 by George Orwell, a continual revision of the language (known as newspeak) is employed by the state to control the parameters of how the populace can understand a given subject.

Now I should warn you that words have created more revolutions than anything else, they are the most dangerous weapon you can wield, if used correctly…

An example of newspeak is Minitrue (Ministry of Truth) which controls the flow of information such as news, entertainment, art etc.  The main character of the story, Winston Smith works at Minitrue and continually revises historical documents to show that the party has always been right, living standards are increasing and anybody who turns against the party has always been a untoward character.

The real purpose of the modification of language however is to restrict the conceptual understanding of the people, the official newspeak dictionary continually gets smaller and so with it the ability to challenge the ideological framework of the state.

So my first example of using language to destroy ideological framework comes from former Federal reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan:

Rather than restricting the dialogue of the opposition Greenspan has simply used words that have no real content, and thus to interpret what he has said is akin to the task of nailing jelly to a tree…

Please take note of the next time you see a politician get asked a hard question, they use similar principles to avoid giving an answer.

Perhaps you have noticed the Australia has a defense force, that it uses to invade other countries…

Perhaps you have noticed that the abortion debate has two pro camps, pro life and pro choice.  Clearly neither side wishes to be viewed as negative.

In that last 50 years or so we have seen the rise of political correctness.  The history of political correctness is also known as cultural Marxism, and is associated with the philosophical school known as critical theory.  Critical theory in this author’s opinion is not philosophy as much as an anti-philosophy, for it fails to encompass all schools of thought and it’s primary modus operandi is to restrict the permissible dialogue of others.  The Frankfurt school was the base used by Herbert Marcuse to promote and modernise the concept of political correctness.

Marcuse argued that the free society was a deception and in reality oppressive, and argued for liberating tolerance, defined as: Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left

Please enjoy all three parts of the history of political correctness.

So what effect does this have on you now?

This ideology has resulted in the oppression of free speech, now both the left and right of politics dogmatically adhere to the concepts contained within the ideological framework of political correctness.

If you don’t agree with the Israeli occupation of Palestine you are branded are an anti-Semite (most likely by the ADL).

If you don’t agree with foreign countries buying up all the farmland in your country you are branded as a xenophobic or racist.

If you use the word mankind people accuse you of being sexist.

The sad fact is people have become far too precious… The author is a rabid supporter of unrestricted free speech because the fact is you don’t have to listen to anyone, but once you start censoring people it is the slippery slope on the road to tyranny and despotism.

Pervasive state surveillance in the theme of 1984

It would appear that over the years, the concept that the state knows what’s best for the people has taken a strong grip in the minds of the populace.  Perhaps what most people do not realise is that privacy is the cornerstone of freedom and it would appear that the state offers us security in return for our liberty or our right to privacy.

To quote Ben Franklin “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety

So how does one know if the state is pervasively surveilling you?  I propose to you that if you have not injured another then there is no need for the state to keep records about your activities.

Now let’s have a little look at some of the surveillance programs the state runs.

Trapwire is definitely something you should have a look into, it collects data from basically everywhere and compiles it into a centralised system to determine who is a potential threat.

Please consider that the federal government is proposing a massive expansion of the surveillance of the population, that has been described as “this proposal is akin to tactics that we would have seen utilised by the Gestapo”.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-05/data-retention-plan-likened-to-gestapo-tactics/4243402

Now I think we are all smart enough to realise that once a power is granted rarely very rarely is it ever retracted.  You should also be aware that the greater the surveillance the closer we get to a totalitarian regime.  History shows that the greater the corruption and largess in government, the greater the need to watch the populace for paranoia and a fear of rebellion grip the inner circle of power.  If your interested in history, why not have a quick look at the files the Stasi kept on the citizens…

Some might propose that the collection of information is only a problem for criminals and terrorists and can be used to do real good.  Well since we have a rule of law…  why not employ it and use it to gain a warrant to track someone?

Furthermore you may or may not be aware the document below that states on page 2 paragraph 5

https://occupymelbournenet.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/saic.pdf

One could consider that access to “cyberspace” is not a right – it is a privilege. Some countries have adopted
the International Computer Driving License (ICDL) or related constructs to deliver necessary ICT knowledge to
their populations. An Australian ICDL could include “rules of the road” including balancing “free speech” with
the consequences of cyber bullying, libel, computer ethics, and an education about other important cyber
issues such as cyber crime (including fraud). In situations where someone has violated the code of conduct
or committed a crime, a judge could have the ability to suspend or revoke someone’s Computer Driving
License.

In other words your servant (the government) has decided that you do not have the right to access information, your servant grants you a privilege to access information and if you don’t follow you servants rules then you will be punished…

So I leave you with the answer, with some humor, because without it the world would be a terrible place:

The revision of history, in the theme of 1984

How could one tell if history has been revised and edited?

Certainly history if full of power mad emperors, kings and dictators that win a battle and rewrite history, no doubt to make themselves appear as some deity.  The evidence lies within alternate records that were not destroyed and thus revealed at a later date.  Therefore I could claim that simply by showing examples of the revision of history or an alternate record, I could claim that, indeed this most nefarious practice is not out of date…

The first example shall be JFK.  I personally cannot accept the official story the there was a magic bullet that turns 7 times in mid air, feel free to sample a scene from Oliver Stone’s movie JFK

If you have further interest may I suggest a fantastic compilation of stock footage found in the epic: Evidence of Revision, see part 1 below.

The second example shall be Robert Kennedy.  Now this one does take a little looking into, basically the official version is Sirhan Sirhan shot him and that was it.  However the coroner determined he was shot at very close range (~under 10cm) from behind, meanwhile all the witnesses agreed Sirhan Sirhan was 4-6 feet in front of Kennedy.  Sirhan Sirhan has no memory of the event and claims quite honestly that this is totally out of character and against his religious upbringing.  May I suggest you have a look at part 4 of Evidence of Revision.

For my third example I propose that history gets re-written right before our eyes…

%d bloggers like this: