Video: Entertaining In-Depth Explanation of Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) Origins and Behaviors

occupymelbournenet:

Beware the SJW

Originally posted on saboteur365:

NOT A SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR.
walter-williams

THIS IS WHAT A SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR LOOKS LIKE.
sparkle-pony-sjw

ANOTHER SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR.
tumblr_lzib62deY61rp5jfvo1_400

MORE SJW THINKING.
SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR

UH … NO THANKS, SJW LADY.
1-social-justice-warrior

Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) have taken over college campuses as adult administrators have abdicated their responsibility to tell ridiculous children to **** off. The video below offers insights into how today’s generation of youths became SJWs and how it affects us. This video is worth the modest investment in time to get in tune with what’s going on in colleges and universities. Warning, the narrator has a potty mouth.

View original

Wall Street Journal Reporter Found Dead After Controversial OPEC Investigation

occupymelbournenet:

Oil, a dark liquid with dark secrets.

Originally posted on wchildblog:

Source: Activist Post, by John Vibes

This Wednesday, the body of Wall Street Journal reporter David Bird was pulled from a New Jersey river. The 55-year-old journalist had been missing for over a year and investigators were unsure whose body they found until they were able to match the dental records with those of David Bird.

According to police, Bird was found in the Passaic River between Somerset and Morris counties, in an area where he frequently took walks. After all this time, two men were recently canoeing in that part of the river when they came across a red jacket and called police.

Just before his disappearance, Bird was investigating a supply imbalance in the oil industry, and was reporting in a way that was extremely controversial and possibly threatening to elements within that industry. NBC reported that “the family believes that his coverage of OPEC may be…

View original 8 more words

Depreston Courtney Barnett

 

I think this speaks to the housing affordability crisis that has artificially been created in Melbourne (and other Australian cities) by  super funds speculating in real estate.

So enters Courtney Barnett to explain the situation with her unique style of silver tone guitar,  incisive half sung/half spoken word lyrics. Then something really strikes you about this young woman, she actually seems authentic, apparently no make up, jeans and t shirt sensibility. She is almost a reaction to utterly plasticized corporate controlled music and pop culture of the last three decades.

But I guess you would have to be authentic to say, “Hey buying a house is going to be a hell of a struggle in Melbourne right now” rather than the oh so standard response of people just grinning and bearing it to keep up appearances. Thanks for singing about something that really resonates with a lot of people.

Courtney Barnett: More likely to meet Christopher Walken, than put a down payment on a flat in Brunswick.

Remote community protest

OM net remote community

 

Protest On tomorrow 5:30

Parliament house Spring street

Melbourne.

Islamic massacre sensitivity training

 

 

In case you are wondering its supposed to be sarcasm.

Framing a debate

It’s quite difficult to describe the way people can completely distort a topic by framing a debate. Just because I can explain it, it doesn’t mean you can understand it. Basically people can leave out certain parts of a discussion, because it doesn’t support the point they are tying to make, or their general overarching beliefs. Often it is deliberate, but sometimes an incorrect belief occurs because certain facts or observation are simply not known and the lack of information has framed the observation. Example, if a space alien landed on earth on an Australian beach in the summer, that alien might think people always wear beach wear, because its always hot. That alien might think everyone speaks English, wears rubber sandals, drinks beer. Of course the aliens observations are framed  by only seeing part of the picture. Of course we could also deliberately frame the observation and show the alien our science institutions to make the alien think we are smart.

Even really smart people can draw the wrong conclusions from a framed observation or debate. Its easier to explain with some pictures.

Some Australian trees with a reflection in water.

Some Australian trees with a reflection in water.

 

framing2

Something is going wrong here, I’m sure you have noticed the right side of the picture.

This is the same picture with just a little more added to the frame, suddenly your mind starts doing all kind of back flips trying to explain to itself what is wrong here  and what piece should be ignored or is perhaps some sort of trickery. The problem is you have been caught by the cognitive dissonance of your optical perception. Your visual processing wants to chop certain parts of the picture out because they fly in the face of a fundamental assumption, gravity. As you are struggling with this other piece start to seem out of place that you discounted before at being too trivial to worry about. Finally you realize you were tricked from the beginning, because you made an incorrect assumption from the beginning. Your world was literally upside down.

Back to normal, you were shown the world upside down and you almost believed it.

Back to normal, you were shown the world upside down and you almost believed it.

This is how powerful framing is in debates and information in general. You can be made to believe things fundamentally opposite to the truth and be quite certain of them, if you consider only some of the available information. So what trickery did I use to make those pictures? Just the cropping tool and a vertical flip of the picture. I could have done it with a few printed photos, a razor blade and ruler, a computer was not required and neither was anything complex.

 

Remember what just happened in your head and how it happened,

you are probably being fooled like this about a lot of things.

Billions wasted on job search fraud

ABC 4 corners investigation has uncovered the amoral gamification of government contracts purported to offer job seeker assistance.

http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/four-corners/NC1504H004S00

This video may not be available after march 9 2015 so get in fast.

Forging and falsifying documents seemed to be industry standard practice.

Specific rorts uncovered were:

Categorizing people into more at risk categories in order to get more funding.

Claiming payments for assisting job seekers into work even when the job seeker was not assisted.

Funneling job seekers into in-house training courses  order to claim a training payment, often the training was low quality, inappropriate or never actually provided.

 

What is more shocking was successive governments were aware of the widespread fraud and waste but did nothing to punish the fraudsters.

So a total of 18 billion dollars was spent on this program, conservative estimates are that about half was fraud by the contracted  agencies.

18 billion dollars spent over a 16 year period is a lot of money, what else could be done with such a sum.

In November  1960 President Kennedy was elected and quite quickly promised to have a man on the moon before 1970.

In the period of 1961 and 1969, 34 billion dollars was spend on getting man on the moon.

So effectively we could have had half a moon landing for the price of the wacky ideologically driven ‘be mean to the battlers’ program.

The original NASA moon landing from 1961 to 1969 cost 34 billion dollars. Australia waste about half this amount harassing unemployed people in the early 21 century and has not landed a man on the moon.

The original NASA moon landing from 1961 to 1969 cost 34 billion dollars. Australia wasted about half this amount harassing unemployed people in the early 21 century and has not landed a man on the moon.

So who is behind all of this, who else Tony Abbott,

Minister for employment when the program was announced,

under John Howard.

 

 

Polacks emigrate to 8chan, 4chan dying

1394617877075

A  8chan/pol/ user in the process of migration.

A 8chan/pol/ user in the process of migration.

https://8ch.net/pol/index.html

http://h.8ch.net/pol/

 

With recent scandals such as #Gamergate, censorship, moderation bias and the infestation of SJW moderators, The diehard politically incorrect  /pol/  users (AKA Polacks) have largely left 4chan and have set up their HQ in the rather new 8chan, also called infinitychan.

8chan was designed to look much like /pol/ did on 4chan and its is just as politically incorrect as ever. Its not a place for the weak of heart, stomach, or nerves.

Have you blood pressure medication in standby, along with you butt hurt cream if you dare visit 8chan/pol/ . You’ll read some interesting discussions which you will be able to take part in anonymously* (what passes for anonymously these days at least), you also read some complete crap and some really offensive things. You’ll read things there some people won’t wont you to read, and one of those people may be you.

It’s called freedom of speech,

and it also includes the freedom to be offended,

and offend others.

 

If the following video offends you, 8chan/pol/ may not be the right place for you.

Hjernevask (Brainwash) Norway 2010

A television series from Norway broadcast in 2010 attempting to address a series of issues that had been heavily influenced by cultural Marxism in many Scandinavian countries.

The series uses the provocative title meaning ‘Hjernevask’ brainwash, implying the entire society has been brainwashed and simply cannot see the fact.

When the man from the anti racism body states “there are no races”,

it really makes you want to ask “if there are no races, how can there be racism?”

What makes the series most interesting is that it does not really push any one conclusion but rather shows a series of viewpoints from high profile Norwegian and international commentators.

So make up your own mind.

Make sure you turn on subtitles!

youtube subtitles button

The entire series as a YouTube playlist:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd9_g7lAICxtlGbxh4_z8ik178o8CDPnv

Or simply start at part one of the seven part series:

 

Abbott whip it and shake it off

 

After divisive party spill (leadership) vote Tony Abbott effectively shoots the messenger by sacking party whip Phillip Ruddock. Even Opposition parties were taken aback at the apparent knee jerk reflex of Tony Abbott’s faction, dishonoring a well liked and long serving parliamentarian.

 

 

 

As the bad press around Abbott mounts, one can only imagine he is simply living in a self constructed fantasy land. Having bee initially endorsed by the media tyrant Rupert Murdoch, he has now completely ‘Jumped the shark’  now being criticized by the very same Murdoch.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 218 other followers

%d bloggers like this: