Category Archives: Socialism
Types of political idealogies
You really need to see this on a really big screen.
The word “dysgenic” was first used, as an adjective, about 1915, by David Starr Jordan, describing the dysgenic effect of World war I. Jordan believed that healthy men were as likely to die in modern warfare as anyone else, and that war killed only the physically healthy men of the populace whilst preserving the disabled at home. Stolen straight from Wikipedia.
In essence war weakens a society immediately and for generations to come.
So an entirely plausible chart showing causes and effects of various social institutions and political themes leading to a feedback loop between banks and those pushing progressive (politically correct) culture. Was this actually planned this way of was it an accidental consequence of different groups lust for power at all costs? Either way it is a very interesting analysis of some very big issues. There is the further prong to the assault of attacking logical reasoning also, to prevent people from comprehending what is actually going on.
One can almost image it as a power point presentation being displayed somewhere quite vile.
A television series from Norway broadcast in 2010 attempting to address a series of issues that had been heavily influenced by cultural Marxism in many Scandinavian countries.
The series uses the provocative title meaning ‘Hjernevask’ brainwash, implying the entire society has been brainwashed and simply cannot see the fact.
When the man from the anti racism body states “there are no races”,
it really makes you want to ask “if there are no races, how can there be racism?”
What makes the series most interesting is that it does not really push any one conclusion but rather shows a series of viewpoints from high profile Norwegian and international commentators.
So make up your own mind.
Make sure you turn on subtitles!
The entire series as a YouTube playlist:
Or simply start at part one of the seven part series:
Men have basically decided the rules (written and unwritten) around women, relationships and society just don’t suit them any more and are simply refusing to play. While it may seem like a fad or a phase, there are serious structural problems causing this and serious consequences including the complete collapse of society. For anyone who disbelieves the significance of this consider what would happen if women simply refused to (or were unable to) get pregnant; extinction in a generation.
Dating sucks for men:
Women with either brand your confident approach as talk rape or you shy approach as creepy.
Women are encouraged to classify a wide range of male behaviors as abusive.
Women making an accusation against men are glorified regardless of whether the claim is legitimate.
Women can accuse you of rape and you will find yourself guilty until proven innocent and punished before evidence is produced.
Work sucks for men:
Men have been competing against women in the workplace for decades now, with such a large labour pool and shrinking jobs, wages and conditions, it is not easy.
Sure its hard for everybody to make a living, but men have the added pressure to make enough to at least partially support a wife and children.
Given the relatively low reward in getting married, men are simply not making the effort to climb the career ladder, some opt out of work completely.
Marriage sucks for men:
Divorce rates are high.
Access to your children post divorce is precarious.
You are likely being forced to pay for someone else’s children that you raised as you own.
Divorce is in most cases initiated by the woman.
Of course much of this is driven by feminism, but feminism’s greatest enemy is just around the corner, the sexbot.
The technology solution to women being taught to to be so antagonistic to men, is to simply recreate the desired parts of the woman sans the politically correct societal destroying baggage.
For those that think this is a fantasy observe the following analytic:
Objections to a planned ISIS terrorist recruitment center (Mosque) in Bendigo have been discriminatory and racist, a lawyer for Bendigo Council has told Victoria’s planning umpire.
Security risk of Islamo-fascist fortresses.
Of the new islamic fortresses (mosques) initiated this year 100% are 0-10km from an airport/airfield/RAAF base.
And no one finds this is suspicious and worth ASIOs attention instead of the Local Councils rubber stamp?
• Mareeba (Marreeba airfield + 4hrs drive /short flight to Lavarack – Barracks &RAAF base Townsville),
• Penrith (Glenbrook RAAF base),
• Bendigo (mosque borders airport, 1hr drive/short flight to Puckapunyal Army & RAAF base), Currumbin (6km to GC Airport),
• Kalgoorlie Boulder (airport & explosives school),
• Sunshine Coast (Airport),
• Toowoomba’s first mosque opened this year & is 1 minute to the airbase that is home to 210 Squadron Australian Air Force Cadets’ ! and a couple of minutes flight from there (33 mins by car) to Oakey Army Aviation base.
• I know they are building & enclaving in Tarneit/Truganina which happen to be adjacent to the RAAF bases at Laverton & Point Cook in Victoria.
I just can’t believe we aren’t treating this as hostile!
They are strategically positioning to take out many of our air defences & army bases.
For more information:
OK I said it Nigger. Nigger, Nigger, Nigger… That’s what they want to call them selves, but if anyone else says it they are racist or prejudiced, even other blacks.
So lets face it Nigger is not strictly defined by race or ethnicity, its actually defined by a value system that promotes theft, thuggery, violence, drug dealing, drug dependence, ignorance, misogyny, tyranny and squalor, basically Marxism for the very stupid.
Of course you can contribute to society if you chose to and put in some effort and learn a useful skill. In the accounting of life you can chose to be an asset or a liability, too many people are choosing to be a liability.
So lets spell it out really clearly:
1) A large frame man (Man A) steals a box of cigars from a store using threats of violence.
2) (Man A) Punches a man (Man B) in the face while man B is sitting in his car.
3) Man B stops further up the road and gets out of his car.
4) Man B is stunned and partially blinded in one eye from the punch, Man B is afraid Man A will try to steal his gun and then kill him.
5) Man A charges at Man B, Man B yells at Man A to stop, Man A keeps charging.
6) Man B starts shooting at Man A, because that is the only way he can preserve his own life.
7) Man A receives multiple guns shots the last one or two being fatal.
So who is at fault here, Man A or Man B?
If you say Man B is at fault you clearly aren’t looking at the facts, and it is you who is prejudiced.
So the Niggers start rioting and looting, attempting to create a race war and blame all the non-Niggers for it. Marxist are all over it, but as usual are backing the wrong horse.
Police brutality and excessive force are sadly common, I have seen plenty of it first hand, but this was not an example of it. This was an example of a man defending himself against a murderous thug.
Thugs please be fore-warned: I will defend my self using everything at my disposal to defend my life, So don’t be surprised when you get your ass handed to you.
Update 13 March 2015:
They are at it again, two police officers shot at a ‘protest’ in Ferguson MO.
While trying to make the case that Gough Whitlam’s policy success are thanks to the Greens, (which did not exist at the time and Whitlam was never a member of) The greens have produce this rather shameful poster.
This really speaks volumes about the Greens, totally opportunistic, with gutter level morality and absolutely no sense of tact.
In this spirit of this shameful act on the memory of a man dead but not even buried yet, we put the shoe on the other fott and give to the greens another great progressive, Joe Hockey.
Most interestingly during the media frenzy around the passing of Whitlam there has been little mention of the constitutional crisis at the time of his sacking, because that would bring up the fact Australia has a constitution, and people might actually start asking questions about the limits of governmental powers it imposes. Fortunately the Greens will never attempt to claim credit for our work.